It should be transparent, but also much rarer. They should focus on efficiently removing plainly illegal content, and bring in some First Amendment experts to adjudicate a minimalistic interpretation of what's illegal. If there are instances where the company has an interest in removing or otherwise burying legal content for business reasons, then yes, that should be transparent.
Great thoughts Sriram! As always, great admirer of your content.
In grand scale of things, does open sourcing of decisioning triggering account bans infuse more trust in social platforms? Does it really matter to masses
It should be transparent, but also much rarer. They should focus on efficiently removing plainly illegal content, and bring in some First Amendment experts to adjudicate a minimalistic interpretation of what's illegal. If there are instances where the company has an interest in removing or otherwise burying legal content for business reasons, then yes, that should be transparent.
Great thoughts Sriram! As always, great admirer of your content.
In grand scale of things, does open sourcing of decisioning triggering account bans infuse more trust in social platforms? Does it really matter to masses